Horner, Dominicali: Double diffuser was our downfall
November 2, 2009 by SJ Skid
Filed under People & Events, SJ Skid
Both Red Bull and Ferrari’s team bosses are pointing to the double diffuser as the reason for Brawn GP’s success and their own failures in 2009.
In separate Q&As with Autosport, Christian Horner and Stefano Dominicali both hold little back about the design element that helped the Brawn GP cars jump to such overwhelming leads in the first half of the season.
First Horner; my emphasis added in both:
If you reflect on the season for us, the damage was done in the first third. I think in reality, probably the double diffuser had a big impact on that. Brawn GP made hay while the sun shone and also had great consistency and reliability – and we lost too much ground in the first phase of the championship. I think since Istanbul, we have outscored every team. As I say, the damage was done early on. We’ve developed the car continually through the season, and every member of the team in Milton Keynes can be very proud of what they have achieved this year. We have learned a great deal from this championship and it will make us stronger as a group.
And Dominicali:
I think for sure on the technical side, the championship was in a way steered with the double diffuser situation at the beginning.
That, for us, we had to work on the car without that kind of structure and it was difficult to catch up. We knew it, and this is the reason why – considering what we saw when we did the first step of development, we took the very difficult decision to say in the middle of July, look let’s stop work on this car and work for next season.
[snip]
Q. What are the factors that make you confident next season will see you back at the front?
SD: Well, the confidence comes from the fact that we don’t see any loophole in the regulation that can be considered, I would say, legal. Now things are legal full stop. No discussions and we can look ahead always.
We also did the choice that Ross [Brawn] did with Honda two years ago, to concentrate all the efforts into the new project. I think we did something different to McLaren was because our car was structured so as to not to develop the double diffuser. It was blocked, and that is why we said we don’t have to do work here, because it will not carry on next year. That is why, looking at the numbers we have in the wind tunnel, I am positive now. With my feet on the ground – but for sure positive.
Domincali, especially, circles around the nagging question of whether the double diffuser should have been found legal. I cannot imagine that argument will ever go away. That is unfortunate for Brawn and Jenson Button; Brawn saw a loophole and exploited it, as Formula 1 engineers and teams are supposed to do.
I think the heated disputes about the legitimacy of 2009 — which have been an ongoing theme of F1B podcasts — are more a result of fans’ lack of faith in the FIA than any personal hatred of the Brawn crew. [Probably there are a few exceptions of people carrying ill will toward Ross Brawn and Michael Schumacher from their dominant Ferrari days.] Fans see favoritism toward “smaller teams” and a shake-up in the results — and that is a result of the FIA losing the fans’ trust.
I know I’ve said this before, but I think it bears repeating: Getting back that lost fan trust ought to be Jean Todt’s top priority.
And, no, I don’t think putting Schumacher — or Max Mosley! — in charge of F1 on his behalf is the way to do it.




































What stings Ferrari and Red Bull is that the gentleman’s agreement to not pursue the double-diffuser in its early stages in the offseason was broken by three teams and of course one team profited greatly by doing so.
If a team were to break the gentleman’s agreement to not use KERS in 2010 and go on to win the WC, then there will be a similar amount of grumbling.
There will be a rebound effect from the double diffuser controversy in 2009, and we have already seen how good the Red Bull has become in the last three races of this season.
Ferrari in particular appear to be seething about how ‘09 unfolded. The crazy way Alonso was recruited for 2010 and the team’s abandonment of 2009 after the first few races hints at how badly they want to return the favor in ‘10. Whether or not their rage is properly channeled remains to be seen.
I’m still not 100% sold that stopping development on the ‘09 car was the best approach. I’m sure Ferrari know what they are doing and Stefano alluded to the fact that the F60 wasn’t fundamentally setup to be a good base for the 2010 car, but I can’t shake the thought that the on-track time the other teams have had is invaluable in this day of severely limited testing. I guess we’ll see, hopefully the removal of KERS and the added fuel tank capacity will be enough to make the early start on the redesign worth it…but Macca and Red Bull look very strong…
I totally agree with you if we were talking about Red Bull, Brawn, Force India, etc. Their 2010 cars will likely be evolutions of their ‘09 cars.
In Ferrari’s case, it was a matter of either scrapping ‘09 development entirely or doing what BMW did and designing and building a completely new ‘09 car for mid-season. I’m sure that the F60 does not have the aero or weight distribution that the team would want if it were not for KERS. The 2010 car should be radically different from the F60 and the extra development time (as opposed to ‘09 track time with a bad chassis) might be a difference maker in returning Ferrari to contenders.
Renault is another team that had an absolute dog of a car due to KERS packaging and they are probably going down a completely different route for next year also.
It almost the dia del muerto – can’t we put Max effigies on a stick and set fire to him? Maybe he’ll get the message?
In the UK Thursday is Guy Fawkes Day… how about getting the UK press to change it to Max Mosley day? There are loads of bonfires he could accidentally trip into… And if he goes out in spectacular fashion it might cool the jets of Todt’s nominee to oversee F1. Don’t get me wrong, I admire Schumi… but there is this little saying…
Tacitus, 56AD: “Germans are like a bramble across the path of human destiny that, every once and a while, need to be cut back.”