<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VW considering future engine supplier role</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formula1blog.com/2009/11/27/vw-considering-future-engine-supplier-role/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formula1blog.com/2009/11/27/vw-considering-future-engine-supplier-role/</link>
	<description>Formula 1 Blog Journal of F1 Opinion Formula1blog.com is an online Journal of F1 opinion. The Aristarchus of F1. Auditors of F1 opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4kBeast</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1blog.com/2009/11/27/vw-considering-future-engine-supplier-role/comment-page-1/#comment-64638</link>
		<dc:creator>4kBeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1blog.com/?p=10147#comment-64638</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with Porsche in F1? Wouldn&#039;t any manufacturer want to supply engines to a majority of the grid at this level of motorsport? It might make it profitable as well in volume. It cheapens the sport though - doesn&#039;t winning mean less if you supply 2/3 of the grid with engines? I guess the reason why I object to a single supplier. Isn&#039;t the FIA learning its lesson from a single tire supplier?

If VW wants to go racing in a couple of different series, they could race Porsche in F1, Audi in ALMS/GTC, and VW in BTC/WRC. Don&#039;t they also own Lamborghini? Oh wait, they don&#039;t race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with Porsche in F1? Wouldn&#8217;t any manufacturer want to supply engines to a majority of the grid at this level of motorsport? It might make it profitable as well in volume. It cheapens the sport though &#8211; doesn&#8217;t winning mean less if you supply 2/3 of the grid with engines? I guess the reason why I object to a single supplier. Isn&#8217;t the FIA learning its lesson from a single tire supplier?</p>
<p>If VW wants to go racing in a couple of different series, they could race Porsche in F1, Audi in ALMS/GTC, and VW in BTC/WRC. Don&#8217;t they also own Lamborghini? Oh wait, they don&#8217;t race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1blog.com/2009/11/27/vw-considering-future-engine-supplier-role/comment-page-1/#comment-64625</link>
		<dc:creator>SR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1blog.com/?p=10147#comment-64625</guid>
		<description>SJ, I have to agree with your statements about being &quot;less excited&quot; given VW&#039;s interest in the sport only due to the potentially pending &quot;limits&quot; being proposed.  The prospect of having a VW brand in F1 is fantastic at first glance, but their getting involved only if these &quot;counter to everything that is F1&quot; limits are imposed is not interesting to me.  If I have to chose between having one of VW&#039;s premium brands participate in F1 and the sport remaining the technical pinnacle of motorsport...I&#039;ll chose the latter everyday and twice on Sunday.  The day standardization and over-reaching limitations are imposed on F1 is the day they sport ceases to be F1...so at that point, who cares if VW is involved or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJ, I have to agree with your statements about being &#8220;less excited&#8221; given VW&#8217;s interest in the sport only due to the potentially pending &#8220;limits&#8221; being proposed.  The prospect of having a VW brand in F1 is fantastic at first glance, but their getting involved only if these &#8220;counter to everything that is F1&#8243; limits are imposed is not interesting to me.  If I have to chose between having one of VW&#8217;s premium brands participate in F1 and the sport remaining the technical pinnacle of motorsport&#8230;I&#8217;ll chose the latter everyday and twice on Sunday.  The day standardization and over-reaching limitations are imposed on F1 is the day they sport ceases to be F1&#8230;so at that point, who cares if VW is involved or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gc.it</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1blog.com/2009/11/27/vw-considering-future-engine-supplier-role/comment-page-1/#comment-64590</link>
		<dc:creator>gc.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1blog.com/?p=10147#comment-64590</guid>
		<description>So, Formula 1 is still attractive for manufacturers. Reality is that Toyota, BMW and Honda pulled out because of the lack of results and not (only) because they had financial troubles. When you win - or perhaps get valuable points - you can afford the challenge. Think about Mercedes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Formula 1 is still attractive for manufacturers. Reality is that Toyota, BMW and Honda pulled out because of the lack of results and not (only) because they had financial troubles. When you win &#8211; or perhaps get valuable points &#8211; you can afford the challenge. Think about Mercedes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noddy93</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1blog.com/2009/11/27/vw-considering-future-engine-supplier-role/comment-page-1/#comment-64574</link>
		<dc:creator>Noddy93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1blog.com/?p=10147#comment-64574</guid>
		<description>when they buy a team they better call it JettaF1 or I&#039;m buying a Land Rover.... I&#039;ve been driving one for a week and for $75k I&#039;d expect more fun on the street but I got to off-road today and I&#039;m sold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when they buy a team they better call it JettaF1 or I&#8217;m buying a Land Rover&#8230;. I&#8217;ve been driving one for a week and for $75k I&#8217;d expect more fun on the street but I got to off-road today and I&#8217;m sold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Negative Camber</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1blog.com/2009/11/27/vw-considering-future-engine-supplier-role/comment-page-1/#comment-64572</link>
		<dc:creator>Negative Camber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1blog.com/?p=10147#comment-64572</guid>
		<description>VW and McLaren...sounds feasible and I said that Macca can&#039;t go without a girlfriend for very long...they need a manufacturer to woo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VW and McLaren&#8230;sounds feasible and I said that Macca can&#8217;t go without a girlfriend for very long&#8230;they need a manufacturer to woo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
