Sauber confirms Ferrari engines, good progress
November 30, 2009 by SJ Skid
Filed under People & Events, Top Story
New team principal Peter Sauber is much in the news these days; the latest is a Q and A with the official Formula 1 site. Highlights include that his team will be running Ferrari engines; that he’s secured the financial backing to purchase the team (read: no Qadbak); and that he’s confident the team can get good drivers.
Q: Peter, what does the agreement with BMW really mean? Is it true to say that both parties wouldn’t have reached an agreement if there hadn’t been strong signals that the team had a slot on the 2010 grid…
Peter Sauber: This agreement means that the future of the team and the location in Hinwil are secured. I am very relieved about that development. It would have been a crying shame had one of the best Formula One factories closed down. Regarding the slot on the grid I am very confident that we will be given a final confirmation very shortly.Q: Do you expect the confirmation to come during next month’s FIA meeting in Monaco?
PS: I am pretty confident that there will be a decision before that date.Q: Did you feel obligated to keep the team alive?
PS: I was strongly focused on that topic before I made the decision to acquire the team. Now the responsibility rests solely on my shoulders, but be sure that I will do everything in my power to secure a positive future for the team.Q: How have you got the finances in place? Will Qadbak, the investment group that had planned the original deal with BMW, get involved now? Or do you envisage something similar to what happened between Honda and Brawn last year?
PS: I have obtained the financial resources for the acquisition by myself. No other backers are involved.Q: There was always an air of mystery surrounding Qadbak, with some suggesting the name was a composition of the initials of Qatar, Abu Dhabi and Bahrain. Can you shed a bit more light on it now?
PS: I have not made any comments on Qadbak in the last two months and I want to keep it that way.Q: You faced a difficult task to reduce the number of staff by around 130 to reach the agreed headcount of 250. The Hinwil workforce was a perfectly functioning unit. How have you tried to avoid slumps in quality?
PS: That was indeed a very painful procedure. In my 40-year career as an entrepreneur I have never before had to lay off staff on financial grounds. All departments were equally affected by the cutbacks and there is a hope that no quality issues will arise. Regarding performance, we will try to compensate for the lower headcount through efficiency.Q: You could benefit from Toyota’s withdrawal. Without it, would you have to have waited for one of the new entrants to falter?
PS: The FIA had already promised us the 14th slot on the grid. Under that circumstance it would have been our obligation to persuade the one team that had voted against us to accept our entry.Q: From your position as a minority stakeholder you have been propelled back into the team principal’s role…
PS: It was truly never my desire to return to the pit wall. But once I decide for myself to get involved with something, then I am fully committed and do it with all my passion.Q: It seems as though the development of the 2010 car has not been affected by BMW’s withdrawal. What is the state of affairs?
PS: Our 2010 car is perfectly on schedule. The development and fabrication have been unaffected by the situation. Having been able to proceed with uninterrupted development was also possible thanks to excellent cooperation with Ferrari, who submitted all the relevant data very early. Regarding the performance of the C29 we are all very confident. Two months before the first tests, we have already reached a very good basis for further development.Q: So after four years of racing a BMW engine, you’re back using a Ferrari engine…
PS: That was one of the fixtures very early on. Shortly after BMW announced its withdrawal at the end of July I talked to (Ferrari chairman) Luca di Montezemolo and in a very short time – and without any bureaucracy – we received an okay. We will use a Ferrari engine and drive train.Q: How about the driver line-up? Is the market for good drivers already swept clean?
PS: No, definitely not. And we have two very attractive cockpits to offer.Q: How is your schedule looking for the coming weeks?
PS: On my personal list there are two priorities – the slot on the grid and the Concorde Agreement. Then I will look for drivers. My guess is that a lot of time will be consumed by the restructuring from 380 employees to 250.
Sauber makes it sound like progress and the team are in pretty good shape, and judging by his comments on having to scale back the size of the team, he also sounds like he’d be a pretty OK boss.
His thoughts on the driver situation is interesting, as the usual suspects are mostly tied up already. I wonder who he has in mind. My gut says it is the “good” drivers who have been off the grid for at least a year — the Anthony Davidsons of the world — although Nick Heidfeld has to be in the running.
Ah! Ferrari engine. Maybe a Mr. Fisichella?



































“Hopes die last” – from diary of die-hard Ant Davidson fans.
Ant’s “Astronomical Potential” is another Well inflated quality circulated by the British Press
To be realistic there are more drivers on 2009 grid who have “Current” Racing experience and who are more race ready than Mr. Davidson. Who doesn’t have as much racing experience both racing and testing F1 cars (haven’t heard him doing any other racing series as well).
His Testing experiences till 2005 are null and void not to mention Sato had better measure of him in Aguri, but for one race where Ant really had dream weekend.
To his credit he does a better job in commenting and should be promoted to TV-Seat from Radio-Seat (along with Croft). If he doesn’t get that permanent TV Commentator slot it will be another case of “Immense Potential” in Testing ;-)
the problem with including Sauber on the grid could be the absurde FIA new entrant rule about using cosworth engines, and that’s why they are’nt still admittet.
I’ve read usf1 wanted toyota lump but was obliged to take a coswort, as Virgin and Campos.. but considering an historic team as sauber, which did more than 15 years of f1 as a new entrant isn’t right.
Also the cosworth rule is absurde, a Max rule to controle newcomers.. why a new team couldn’t use a better engine if they can afford it?